Discussion:
The Portfolio Holder for Adult Services
commended the Committee on its decision with regard to acute
inpatient mental health beds in Medway and informed the Committee
of highlights of achievements under this portfolio. This included:
- Community care – that
Age UK Medway had successfully opened an office in Chatham and that
Adult Social Care ended last year within budget,
despite significant pressures, and started 2013 leaner and fitter
for purpose making back office savings in order to protect
frontline care services;
- Health
– he referred to the improvements,
which had been brought about by bringing back in-house the adult
mental health social care staff, which he felt, had been the right
decision. He referred to the
importance of working with partners in tough economic times and
paid tribute to the excellent work done by carers. He stated that he was pleased to note the increase
in people using personal budgets and direct payments;
- Older people
– reference was made to the focus on safeguarding
vulnerable adults this year;
- Public Health – the
staff had now moved to the Council and there had been a
comprehensive induction programme for them. He referred the enthusiasm with which public
health staff had taken on their new roles and the work underway
with other Council departments on public health
initiatives. He referred to a number of
public health initiatives in relation to tobacco control and sexual
health and
- Services for people with a
learning disability;
- Telecare/telemedicare –
there was excellent work being done to enable people to remain in
their own homes where they wished to do so with support from
telecare and telemedicare;
- The Portfolio Holder then paid
tribute to the staff working across adult social care, the Overview
and Scrutiny Committee and support officers.
He was then questioned on the following:
- The regularity of reviews of those
people who have personal budgets/direct payments – it was
explained that these were generally undertaken annually or could be
reviewed at any point if it was felt necessary
- The suggestion that all Council
reports should be required to indicate the public health
implications – it was felt that these implications were
constantly under review as decisions were taken
- Problems faced by people applying
for a mortgage but being refused on the basis that a direct payment
was not classified as a stable income (it was agreed that a written
response should be given to this question)
- Respite care for carers of people
with physical or learning disability – it was stated that
this was available although more was needed
- The lateness of the awarding of the
Healthwatch contract – it was agreed that the contract had
been one of the last in the country to be awarded
- Whether the homes recently
privatised had been visited by the Portfolio Holder –it was
stated that visits were planned for September with the Deputy
Director, Children and Adults
- What would be the biggest hurdle for
the forthcoming year? – it was felt that working within
budget constraints would be the biggest challenge
- In balancing the budget how did the
Portfolio Holder forsee being able to balance this against the
needs presented (a written response was agreed for this item)
Decision:
The Portfolio Holder for Adult Services was
thanked for his presentation.