Discussion:
The Director of
Transformation and Partnerships and the Chief Operating Officer
& Deputy Chief Executive from Kent and Medway Mental Health
Trust (KMMH) introduced the report which provided an overview of
the outcome of the Trust’s recent inspection
by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) and an update on progress
being made.
Members then raised a number of questions and comments, which
included:
- Actions
taken – in response to a question on why the Trust had
not addressed some of the issues identified by the CQC ahead of the
inspection, given they had already been aware of them, KMMH
representatives explained that some of the findings related to
community mental health services models of care and waiting times
which had been worked on for 18 months and a refreshed model was
now in place to address these issues. Where health and safety
issues had been raised, such as mandatory training, steps had been
put in place to address those immediately and there were now
standard checks and polices in place to reflect that. The CQC had also identified concerns around risk
assessments and it was explained that the Trust had been
introducing a new risk assessment centred around patients in a more
holistic approach.
- Long waiting
lists - The Trust representatives explained that KMMH had not
accounted for the large numbers of patients that would come through
their system for lower or medium level intervention that would need
to be delivered by an organisation outside of KMMH and the lack of
planning for this had caused large waiting lists. One of the
immediate actions that needed to be addressed following the CQC
inspection was that the Trust needed to assure itself that people
waiting for a response were not at risk and had had their needs
adequately assessed. Due to the volume, at the time of the
inspection the Trust could not and therefore immediately
implemented ways to assess people to ensure patient safety.
- All age mental
health contract – concerns were raised at the ability of
KMMH, given the context of the CQC outcome, to manage the
children’s mental health and the all age eating disorder
service, both of which were being transferred to KMMH to create and
all age mental health service contract. The KMMH representatives
explained that improvements had been made to waiting lists, stating
that at the point of the inspection of Medway services, 466
patients were waiting over 90 days to be seen, which had since
reduced to 199 and regular checks were in place for those waiting
longer periods of time to insure interventions where put in place
where necessary. In addition, the average wait for Medway patients
was 52.3 days, which was one of the lowest waits across Kent and
Medway and the average wait for the new risk assessment and care
planning was around 21 days for Medway patients. In relation to the
transfer of services, the Committee were advised that staff
currently working in the service under NELFT (the current provider)
would be transferring to KMMH, therefore skill set would also
transfer to the Trust, however, the Committee remained concerned
and suggested that they formally write to the ICB regarding those
concerns.
- Leadership
capacity – concern around the effectiveness of the
Trust’s leadership was raised, particularly in the context of
taking on extra services and it was asked how the Board was
reacting to the challenges. The KMMH representatives explained that
the Trust recognised there was a lot that it needed to address as
an organisation. An independent review
had been undertaken and its findings and recommendations had been
fully considered by the Board. It was confirmed that the current
Chair was reaching the end of the amount of time in which she could
act as Chair and therefore recruitment for a new Chair was
underway. It was also stated that the Board’s main priority
and focus was on the response to the CQC inspection and
improvements to services. Members remained concerned and suggested
that the Chief Executive and a Board Member of the Trust be invited
to the next meeting to address the Committee’s concerns in
this regard.
- Places of
safety – in response to a concern that the Trust had been
detaining people for too long under the Mental health Act in places
of safety, it was confirmed that this was addressed within a week
of the Trust becoming aware that this had been happening.
- Trust
rebranding – Members criticising the spend on rebranding
the Trust from KMPT to KMMH. In response the Trust representatives
explained that it had been undertaken in response to feedback from
patients and stakeholders around the previous name, KMPT, being
meaningless to them.
- Phasing of
improvements – concern was raised about the phasing of
addressing the issues and that the suggested timescales were too
ambitious. In response the KMMH
representatives explained that transformation was continually being
monitored. It was reiterated that the inspection had occurred when
the transformation had already begun and that progress was
monitored regularly, several times a week. Equally, it was acknowledged that transformation
of culture and embedding new ways of working would be a longer term
piece of work.
- Co-production
of transformation – the KMMH representatives confirmed
that transformation plans had been co-produced with services users,
lived experience groups and voluntary sector partners and they
undertook to share findings from engagement with Members.
Decision:
a)
The Committee noted the update from KMMH, as set out in the
appendix.
b)
The Committee requested that the Chief Executive of KMMH and a
member of its Board attend the January meeting of the Committee,
noting that regular attendance of the Trust at future meetings was
likely.
c)
The Committee agreed it would consider sending a formal letter of
concern to the ICB regarding the lift and shift of the all age
mental health contract from NELFT to KMMH