This report presents the update requested by Overview and Scrutiny on 22 August 2023. It contains data that outlines the impact of the new adult substance misuse treatment service. It also details the work taking place to develop a collaborative approach with criminal justice partners, and work to improve the continuity of care between prison and community for people who use substances.
Minutes:
Discussion:
The Head of Public Health
Programmes introduced the report which provided an update on the
substance misuse treatment service. He
explained that progress was being made with good outcomes and the
services had settled well since the contract commenced a year ago.
There were risks relating to the uncertainty of future funding but
that collaborative partnership working would help to safeguard the
service.
Members then raised a number of
questions and comments, which included:
·
Alcohol – concern
was raised that despite being the substance that causes the most
significant harm, there was not enough emphasis on alcohol.
Officers confirmed that alcohol was the reason for more deaths in
Medway than drugs and reassured the Committee that substance misuse
encompassed alcohol too. There was also a specific alcohol pathway,
treatment which was continuing to improve.
·
Individual Payments Scheme
– the representative from Forward Trust (the
service provider) explained that the project, which aimed to
achieve sustainable employment for people in substance treatment,
was due to commence in July and was already running successfully in
other areas.
·
Staffing and vacancy rates
– reference was made to the 13 vacancies
quoted in the report. Officers undertook to provide exact staffing
figures to Members but confirmed that the vacancy rate had
reduced. Recruitment had been a
challenge due to a lack of trained substance workers and staff
being deterred by fixed term contracts. The vacancy rate was
impacting most on service’s outreach work. Following a
further query, it was added that an opportunity escalator was in
place where individuals that had completed treatment could work as
peer support. There were further
traineeship opportunities once someone had abstained from substance
misuse for 3 years. The Forward Trust representative undertook to
provide the fall-out rate from the scheme.
·
Support for ex-prisoners – in response to a question about how ex-prisoners were
supported by the service, officers explained there was a Continuity
of Care Toolkit which enabled the service to work as a system, with
the prison and probation services, to assess an individual’s
pathway and identifying particular areas for that person that
required support and solutions.
·
Young people services – officers explained that research was currently being
undertaken to explore the reasons behind young people’s use
of substances and that the service was looking to develop an all
age service for young people, with an age appropriate response to
service users.
·
Mental health support – a question was raised about how the service supported
its clients to also access mental health services, as being a
person who used substances could often be a barrier to accessing
mental health services. In response
officers confirmed that there was a Co-occurring Condition Protocol
in place. A survey was currently underway with frontline workers to
gain their views and knowledge about the protocol and why they
might not be using it. This would then lead into the development of
pathways and through the mental health transformation, ensuring
co-occurring conditions was recognised across the system. The
Forward Trust representative added that she had seen improved
linkage between mental health and substance misuse
support.
·
Foetal Alcohol Syndrome Disorder
(FASD) – reference was made to FASD
and whether potential FASD was a factor for service
users. Officers explained that women of
child-bearing age were advised and supported in relation to FASD
risks but undertook to take the suggestion back, as it could be
something explored with all service users to further understand a
patient’s needs.
· Interventions through schools – a question was raised about whether as a preventative measure, collaboration took place with schools. In response officers confirmed that they did collaborate with the education sector, youth service and the youth offending team but always welcomed further opportunities to engage with young people about the risks of substance misuse.
Decision:
The Committee noted the report and requested a briefing note providing more information in relation to vacancy and staffing levels, fall-out figures from the opportunity escalator scheme and the Co-occurring Conditions Protocol survey results.
Supporting documents: