Discussion
The Head of Education
Performance introduced the report which provided an overview of attendance in Medway with a particular
focus on persistent absence.
Members then raised
a number of comments and questions,
which included:
- Data
- in response to comments that the data in the
report were out of date and not in line with the DfE figures on
their website which provided data on absence rates for the entirety
of the last academic year. Officers said that the data reported for
2020/21 was for the full academic year, the most up to date release
of data at the point of writing the report was the autumn 2021
data. The release date for the autumn to spring term would be
October 2022 and the release date for the entirety of the 2021/22
full academic year would be March 2023.
A
Member further commented on the data limits in the report in
comparison to the national data collation and advocated for more up
to date data even if it was provisional data. It was asked what the
process involved in the reporting of attendance between the
Government and the Local Authority. Officers said that the census
data that had been filtered, checked and
finalised was what was contained in the report, the online DfE data
was provisional and subject to change.
- Mental
Health - it was commented that the issue
could only be looked at in context with wider issues and whilst the
presenting issue may be attendance, there were wider underlying
issues that had to be addressed.
Officers agreed that more work needed to be done to support
families as well as schools and this was an area that was being
looked into as part of the task and
finish group review.
- Fines
– it was noted that Medway absence figures had
increased by 23.5% and it was asked if there were resources in
place to issue more fines in the coming academic year, due to the
increase in persistent absence rates which remained a problem in
schools. The number of Penalty Charge Notice had declined
significantly whilst there was a distinct increase in absence.
Officers said that they worked closely with schools to ensure that
they had the necessary evidence to initiate a prosecution on their
behalf. During the pandemic, prosecutions were not possible and
there were still backlogs that needed to be addressed as
prosecutions that had been delayed were still being dealt with. It
was anticipated that there would be an increase in prosecutions due
to the growing rate of persistent absence.
- Alternative
Provision – concern was raised for
young people in alternative provision as their absence from school
could be attributed to other factors. It was asked whether a fuller
report would be provided in the issues experienced and if the task
and finish group would address this as part of the review. The
officer said that the Special Educational Needs and Disabilities
(SEND) green paper posed the question on how young people were
supported and a review of the alternative provision system in
Medway would commence from September 2022. Once the review had been
conducted, a report would be brought before the
Committee.
- Profound and
Multiple Learning Difficulties (PMLD) -
there was concern that nationally the absence figures for children
with PMLD was lower than Medway’s figures and it was asked
what the reason was for this. The officer said that data with the
breakdown with overall absence was in relation to the one Medway
school that caters for children with that need. During the pandemic
they were severely impacted by Covid, and the absence rate was
impacted. Whilst it would appear that
the percentage was significantly higher when compared
nationally, the data had to be looked at in the context that it was
for one school. It was essential to liaise with other attendance
team leads to analyse data and the barriers that schools have with
issues with persistent absence.
Decision
The Committee noted the
report