Discussion
The Head of School
Servicesintroduced the report
which outlined the outcomes of the
consultation on proposals for three Medway grammar schools to
change their admissions arrangements from single sex to
co-educational provisions.
Members then raised
a number of comments and questions,
which included:
- Response
rate – Members were disappointed in
the low number of participation and responses to the consultation.
It was commented that the consultation document was too complicated
which may have impacted on the understanding of the questions
contained in the document. It was considered that more could have
been done to engage and understand how parents felt about this
important decision and thought about the proposals put
forward.
- Consultation
Process – in response to a question
on how the process was managed, the officer said that all education
provisions in Medway were sent the consultation document, with
schools relied on to distribute the paperwork. Drop-in sessions
were held at the grammar schools which were not very well attended
but where people could attend to find out further information and
have questions answered. The majority of respondents were from secondary
school parents with some primary and out of borough respondents.
The number of respondents was disappointing but there was a wide
range of themes in the responses.
- Geographical Range
– in response to a comment that
geographical range to schools must be factored into decision
making, the officer said this was one of the main things being
looked into as the only co-education
school for some parts of Medway was a considerable distance to
children’s homes. The proposal would create a good spread of
co-educational establishment and would enable children to attend a
local school which they may not have been able to due to lack of
availability in their local area and reduce the distance of
travel.
By
changing the arrangements would create a fairer access to schools
for Medway pupils. The consultation was about whether to support
this as a Council. The schools are academies, and they would
conduct their own consultation. This consultation was about the
figures and the Cabinet supporting the decision
financially.
- Selective
Schools - it was commented that there was
no formal policy on this kind of process in Medway and there was a
need for a policy document within the Council on matters such as
this.
- Benefit of
Changes - it was asked how this change
would benefit Medway pupils when a large proportion of places in
Medway grammar schools were from out of borough residents. The
officer said that the changes would provide equal number of boys
the opportunity and flexibility to attend a Medway school. It may
have appeared that this would reduce spaces for girls, but it was
confirmed that this was not the case as currently some of the
girls’ places were taken up by out of borough
girls.
- Parental
Choice –it was commented
that the proposed changes would increase places for boys but
diminish spaces for girls, however the officer stated that it would
increase the opportunity for places for Medway boys and girls. It
was further commented that this reduced the places at single gender
schools, which was a concern as there would be no protection for
parental choice in this regard. Officers acknowledged this and
agreed that further conversations were taking place alongside
discussions on selection and changes to the Medway test.
- Transport – in response to a
question on the effect on transport policy and whether the policy
would be changed, the officer said that transport policy would be
looked into as part of the changes.
Parents would be encouraged to utilise all five preferences
in order to maximise their chances of
being given a preferred school.
- Funding
– the proposed cost of funding from the
Council towards this, was £2.5 million and due to come from
future receipts of S106. It was asked if this had been costed up
and if Trusts had been asked to contribute. The officer said that
the budget had been costed formally with the three schools and was
for adaptations to the schools. Discussions were taking place on
how this would be phased. The finances proposed would come from the
2023/24 basic needs grants allocated from the DfE, and the school
place planning strategy would set out how it its proposed funds
would be utilised.
- Regional Schools
Commissioner(RSC) - it was asked
if the RSC would support this project and if due to low number of
consultees, they could reject the proposals. The officer advised
that the RSC could reject the proposals, but they were aware of the
current consultations and processes taking places as a result of informal conversations that had taken
place. The Assistant Director, Education and SEND added that the
RSC was reasonably content with the direction of
travel.
Decision
The Committee noted the
report