Discussion:
Councillor Josie Iles,
Portfolio Holder for Children’s Services was in attendance
and took questions from the Committee.
Members raised several
questions and comments which included:
- Children’s
Improvement Plan – it was asked
what assurance could be given of the department’s ability to
sustain the improvements made to date now that it was no longer
subject to monitoring of Special Education and Disabilities (SEND).
The Portfolio Holder stated that whilst sufficient progress had
been achieved which resulted in no longer being subject to
monitoring visits, they would continue to receive support as well
as appropriate challenge where necessary. It would be an ongoing
process through various work streams to sustain progress such as
sustained support to the parents’ and carers’ forum and
continued review of practices.
- High Needs Block
Deficit – it was challenged that
the Committee had been assured six months ago through a detailed
report on tackling the high needs deficit and was now being advised
that this could not be resolved. It was asked what was being done
to hold the department to account on the Ten-year recovery plan.
The Portfolio Holder stated that the report was clear that the
forecast did not turn out as expected, was being reviewed and would
form part of the SEND Strategy that would be presented to the
Committee at its next meeting. Officers added that the report
detailed why the high needs recovery plan would not meet its
forecast targets. The service continued to experience pressure such
as increased specialist provision which incurred high costs as well
as increased children with EHC plans. The expected percentage in
growth in High Needs funding over the next 10 years would be
significantly lower than forecasted, and the current plan would not
revolve the deficit issue in 10 years. To maintain the current
plans forecast, annual growth would need to be reduced by 50% and
this was not a viable option.
- Data
- it was highlighted that one of the concerns of the
Ofsted monitoring visits in 2021 and in the latest report was that
the electronic reporting system introduced in April 2021 was not
accurately recording data and the Portfolio Holder was asked how
confident she was in its accuracies. The Portfolio Holder stated
that as far as she was aware the data was accurate and had to be
looked at alongside the commentary provided which explained any
variances. Officers added that the issue with data was complex. A
new system was put in place in April 2021 and the introduction of
the forms with the practice model which mapped through the system
meant that the system would need to be reworked and mapped for a
considerable amount of time to ensure its efficiency and accuracy.
If data presented with any anomalies, they were addressed as they
were recognised, and changes were built into the system as
appropriate. Ofsted used a different reporting tool and the data
tool they used at the time of inspection highlighted some
inaccuracies. The data team was aware of and worked to address
those issues. These types of problems were consistent with the
implementation of a new system which took time to work
through.
- Workforce and
Recruitment – in response to a
question on what further intervention could be put in place to
address workforce issues, the Portfolio Holder stated that
recruitment and retention of staff was a national issue. The
pandemic had a great impact on an area which had already been
problematic for Local Authorities across the country. The
department was continuously exploring different strategies to
manage the market and ensure provision was in place to meet the
needs of children through a robust workforce.
It
was asked how many of the social workers that had been recruited
from overseas were still with the department. Officers said that 12
social workers had been recruited and were all still in post. The
possibility of overseas recruitment remained an option.
- Exclusions - in response to
Members’ concerns about the high instances of exclusion rates
in Medway, the Portfolio Holder stated that they were working on an
action plan in the Corporate Parenting subgroup to explore various
ways of tackling this issue.
- Education Health
Care Plan (EHCP) Wait List - a concern
was highlighted that 66% of children received their EHCP within 20
weeks, officers stated that the National average for receipt of
EHCP within 20 weeks was 52%. The SEND strategy that was being
worked on would seek to address access to provision for children
and young people and resources that could be put in place whilst
they were waiting for assessment. The Draft strategy would be
presented to the Committee at its next meeting.
In
response to a question on the high instance of refusal rates for
ECHPs which was evident nationally and concern on what could be
done to better support parents with their application, Officers
said that the refusal rates were around 50/60% as not all children
met the threshold. Parents and Carers had the right to make an
application for support and further work needed to take place to
support parents in their abilities to submit clear, detailed
applications.
The Vice - Chair thanked the
Portfolio Holder for her attendance and engagement with
Members.
Decision:
The Committee noted the
report.