Discussion:
The Committee considered a report presenting
the Housing Revenue Account capital and revenue budgets for 2022/23
which provided details of proposed rent and service charge levels.
It also contained the latest revised forecasts of the HRA Business
Plan.
Members raised a number
of questions and comments which were responded to by the
Head of Strategic Housing as follows:
- Three-Year Capital Works
Budget: The lost opportunities referred to in the report
referred to the previous arrangement whereby the capital works
budget was set on an annual basis. This had prevented
rationalisation and cost savings which were now possible under the
current three-year programme.
- What was the progress of the
Housing Building Development Programme?: The Council was aiming to increase
its stock by 1% year on year and referred to the three sites in
Twydall which were at the early stages
of development.
- What support was given to tenants
in light of the reduction in Universal Credit and increase in
energy prices?: This was
acknowledged as a challenge in terms of rent arrears; the Housing
and Finance teams worked closely to ensure eligible tenants
received the housing support grant. Investment in housing stock
improvements was reducing energy costs, for example the
installation of energy efficient boilers.
- How many properties were
available through right to buy: The
HRA business plan models for 15 units a year to be lost through the
right to buy, this was increased from 10 units for more recent
iterations of the plan.
- How was the 5 year rolling Mears
contract monitored?: This had been 5
year contract with an option to extend for 5 years. There would be
a retendering exercise next year and tenants’ views would be
sought.
- How were residents’
expectations managed when they were consulted?: Assisted by the Estate Champions,
the Council always sought to explain the detail behind decisions to
residents to ensure a greater understanding of what it was seeking
to achieve.
- Were smaller social landlords
encouraged not to increase rents?:
Members welcomed the decision of MHS not to increase rents and were
advised that discussions had been held with smaller social
landlords although the position on rent increases was mixed.
- Greater mitigation measures were
needed to address rent arrears: Benchmarking had showed that
the Council was in a positive position in this regard; it was doing
all it could to ameliorate the situation.
- What was the rational for the
Council’s 3.5% increase in rent?: The business plan modelled an increase of
2.5% each year; last year’s increase was 1.5% so this
year’s increase brought it back in line with the planned
increase.
- What was the latest position on
void properties?: Workforce
self-isolating as a result of the pandemic had restricted the
amount of work that could be done to bring void properties up to
standard within acceptable timescales, there were also broader
national issues with materials and labour. The Council would
continue to work with Mears to improve the position.
Decision:
The Committee recommended to the Cabinet:
a)
A proposed social rent increase of 3.5% (which is below the allowed
CPI of 3.1 plus 1%) for the social rent housing stock as set out in
Appendix A (based on 52 collection weeks) with effect from 04 April
2022.
b)
A proposed affordable rent increase of 3.5% (which is below the
allowed CPI of 3.1 plus 1%) for the affordable rent properties as
set out in Appendix B (based on 52 collection weeks) with effect
from 04 April 2022.
c)
A proposed rent increase of 5% to be applied to all garage tenure
types with effect from 04 April 2022 as stated in section 4.
d)
That the service charges increases/decreases as set out in Appendix
C of the report for 2022/23 be approved.
e)
That to allow the
service charges cap of 15%, or 10 pence, whichever is the
greater.
f)
That the revenue budget for the HRA service for 2022/23 as per
Appendix D be approved.
g)
That the proposed new budget of £8.2m (as set out in section
8.5.3 & 8.5.4) and a virement of £1.3m from phase 4
budget be approved for Phase 5 new build programme.
h)
That the provision for the repayment of debt based on annuity-based
payment of £0.427m, on the HRA’s outstanding debt for
2022/23 be approved.
i)
That Members approve the revised 30-year HRA Business Plan model as
attached at Appendix E.