Discussion:
The Committee received a report
setting out an annual review of the Highway Infrastructure Contract
for Year 3 of the Contract Term covering the period 1 August 2019
– 31 July 2020.
The following issues were
discussed:
- Localised
flooding - In response to a question
concerning localised flooding, the Principal Engineer informed the
Committee that most drainage systems across Medway were old and had
limited capacity. Therefore, whilst a programme of gully cleansing
was regularly undertaken, in periods of high rainfall, some areas
were prone to flooding until such time that the additional water
could drain away.
- KPI’s – Officers were
requested to provide further information by way of a briefing note
on the Key Performance Indicators referred to on pages 58 and 74 of
the report and appendix.
- Resurfacing of
highways and footways –The
Principal Engineer informed the Committee that both road surfacing
and footway resurfacing schemes were undertaken following a
priority assessment scheme.
- Timing and quality
of repairs – In response to a
question concerning the time taken to complete minor works, the
Principal Engineer explained the process by which works were
undertaken following the issue of a 28 day order. She confirmed
that in the main, works were completed earlier but there were
occasions when this was not possible.
Concerning the quality of repairs, on occasion it was necessary
to undertake a temporary repair which would then be repaired fully
at a later date. The Principal Engineer advised that there was a
rolling programme of inspections for road repairs and she suggested
that if any Member had an issue with a road repair in their Ward,
they notify officers to enable this to be investigated.
- Apprenticeships – Volker’s
Contracts Manager informed the Committee that Volker had been
successful after competing against 100 other nominations to be
awarded the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Excellence Award
for its work within the community. In response to a question
concerning the level of apprenticeships on offer, he advised that
Volker offered 2 – 3 apprentice placements each year and
these roles could cover either administration or trade work. In
addition, Volker also offered re-training opportunities to older
age groups. He was pleased to report that to date at the end of the
training period, all apprentices had been offered roles with the
company.
- Plastic
Kerbs – In response to a question
as to the potential use of plastic kerbing, Volker’s
Contracts Manager advised that such kerbing was suitable for use in
some areas but not others. He assured the Committee that Volkers
continued to investigate new technological advancements especially
where they helped reduce carbon footprint.
- Electric
charging -
The Committee discussed the provision of vehicle electric charging
points, in particular, at the roadside. In response to questions,
Volker’s Contracts Manager advised that Volkers were actively
involved in the installation of vehicle electric charging points in
London. However, for roadside schemes to be successful, it was
necessary for the underlying infrastructure to be in place. The
Committee asked for more information on this issue particularly
taking into account that much of Medway was made up of Victorian
housing and streets.
- Strood Flood
Defence works – In response to a
question as to those works which remained outstanding as part of
the Strood Flood Defence works and the relationship between the
Council’s work on this project and the Rochester Bridge Trust
as owner of some of the land, the Principal Engineer advised that
this was a project being completed by the Council’s
Regeneration team and therefore she would obtain this information
and respond to the Member direct.
- Strood
Redevelopment project – Outstanding works and removal of
pedestrian refuge in Gun Lane - In
response to a question as those works which remained outstanding as
part of the Strood Development project, the Director of Place and
Deputy Chief Executive advised that minor lighting works remained
outstanding and it was hoped these would be completed within the
next few weeks.
Volker’s Contracts Manager advised that there were a few
minor elements of work outstanding and some planting.
The
Committee noted the request for the removal of the pedestrian
refuges in Gun Lane, Strood which had been installed when it had
originally been intended that Gun Lane was to be open to two-way
traffic.
- New
technology – The Principal Engineer
advised of a scheme currently used by Surrey County Council and
trialled by Kent County Council involving use of a device attached
to highways and refuse vehicles which could register the condition
of the highway and in particular pothole detection.
- Medway City Estate
Slip Road - In response to a question
concerning the provision of the Medway City Estate slip road, the
Principal Engineer advised that the Council’s Regeneration
team were responsible for this project and therefore she would ask
the Project Manager to provide an update to the Member direct.
Decision:
The Committee noted the contents of the report
and the annual review for Year 3 of the Highways Infrastructure
Contract as set out in the appendix and agreed the following:
a)
a briefing note be supplied providing a breakdown of
the Key Performance Indicators referred to within the
report.
b)
a briefing note be supplied providing an update on
the availability of new technologies as they relate to street
lighting and vehicle electric charging.
c)
an update be provided as to outstanding Strood Flood
Defence works including consultations with the Rochester Bridge
Trust.
d)
information be supplied as to the outstanding works
as part of the Strood Redevelopment project and in particular
whether works could be undertaken to improve pedestrian access in
Gun Lane including the removal of the existing pedestrian
refuges.
e)
information be supplied as to progress on the
highway works at Medway City Estate and Four Elms Hill.