Community Safety Partnerships (CSPs) are under a duty to produce a Community Safety Plan to formulate and implement a strategy to reduce crime and disorder, combat substance misuse, and reduce re-offending.
This report provides information on the operation of the CSP from October 2019, which summarises the findings of the strategic assessment. This report provides information on the Community Safety Plan covering the period from 2020 to 2024.
Minutes:
Discussion:
The Chairman welcomed the partners of the Community Safety Partnership (CSP) to the meeting.
The Committee discussed the following topics:
· Covid-19 pandemic enforcement concerning business compliance and wearing of face masks – In response to a question concerning enforcement action against non-compliance with Covid-19 rules, the Head of Regulatory Services confirmed that his teams worked closely with the Police on enforcement and he provided a breakdown of the number and type of enforcement actions undertaken to date. This included 14 prohibition notices, 137 voluntary closures of non-compliant premises, 6,503 visits/engagements and the issue of 9 internet take down notices for prohibitive businesses.
He advised that Trading Standards were unable to enforce the wearing of face masks in places such as supermarkets.
Chief Inspector Dyball confirmed that the Police followed up complaints concerning non compliance with Covid-19 rules and undertook home visits where necessary. He advised that if an individual was unable to wear a face mask due to a medical condition or disability, they could wear a sunflower lanyard to indicate this to others.
He drew attention to the crime statistics referred to in the report for the last financial year and provided an update as to the crime statistics for the rolling year specifically, as they related to recorded crime during the Covid-19 pandemic. He advised that there had been a general reduction in the levels of recorded crime through this period but reminded the Committee that double recording of crimes now meant that a crime was not necessarily recorded as one incident but also in the wider context.
Chief Inspector Dyball drew attention to a number of areas where there had been a reduction in reported crime including a 20% reduction in robbery, 28% reduction in home burglaries and a 27% reduction car crime. It was considered that some of these reductions could be as a direct result of people working from home during the Covid-19 pandemic. However, the number of calls to the 999 and 101 service and electronic communication had remained constant and there had been an increase in issues concerning mental health.
He informed the Committee that the HMICFRS had undertaken a inspection of Police support services for staff during the pandemic and the Police as an organisation had been found to be exemplary in the way that it had managed Covid-19 and supported its staff whilst maintaining an efficient service throughout the period.
He also confirmed that there was another post specifically covering Chatham Town Centre which had been funded by Section 106 funding and as this officer had been temporarily redeployed through the Covid-19 lockdown the funding had been extended to January 2022. He advised that once this funding stream ceased, it was intended that the post would continue to be funded either through further Section 106 funding or via Medway Development Company.
Chief Inspector Dyball informed the Committee of the importance of reporting anti social behaviour so that the Police could ensure that resources could be appropriately allocated. He confirmed that Kent Police had recruited additional Police Officers and PCSO’s during the Covid-19 pandemic so that they could tackle anti social behaviour. In addition, there were dedicated Youth Officers and an additional 10 Police officers designated to work with schools.
Chief Inspector Dyball also expressed a wish for communities to assist the Police by taking an active role in the Police Speedwatch campaign.
After the initial lockdown, the Community Payback Scheme was able to re-commence at 92% of the pre-lockdown hours (436 hours per week) and was the highest performing Community Payback Scheme nationally. Under the current lockdown, the scheme had reduced to 60%, providing approximately 285 hours per week. Cynthia Allen advised that many of the Community Payback Schemes were located within charity shops which were now closed but the Gillingham Street Angels continued to be operational.
Group projects were operating at 60% and a number of new projects were planned at allotments, Fort Amherst, Medway Foodbanks, Wayfield Primary School and Community Centres.
Chief Inspector Dybal advised that physical assaults on Police Officers were isolated incidents but when they did occur, the assailants were prosecuted. He advised that Kent Police had been recognised by the HMICFRS as a leader in the provision of staff welfare.
David Read (Kent and Medway Fire and Rescue Service) informed the Committee that within the Fire and Rescue Service there was a good support structure for staff particularly around mental health and regular contact was made with those corporate staff who were working from home. There had been 2% sickness during the summer months.
Sarah Vaux (NHS CCG) advised that within the health service there was an emphasis on the mental health and well-being of staff. However, she advised that since the commencement of the second lockdown, staff were getting tired and working above their contracted hours and were therefore being encouraged to take regular breaks. She advised that over the Christmas/New Year break, it was likely that many international staff would want to take long breaks to return to their families and this was currently under discussion.
Aeilish Geldenhuys, Head of Public Health advised that there was a great level of support from the Leader of Medway Council, the Chief Executive and the Council’s Human Resources Department to provide support for staff and ensuring that they were aware of the support services available. Managers were being encouraged to keep in contact with those either working from home, working on the front line or in a redeployed role.
During the discussion, the Committee acknowledged that the Country was going through the biggest crisis that had faced the world as far back as anyone could remember and that the response of the various agencies had been extraordinary during this period. This built on the strength of the CSP which had been established prior to the Covid-19 pandemic.
Decision:
The Committee thanked the Community Safety Partnership partners for attending the meeting and answering questions and:
a) noted the findings of the strategic assessment.
b) noted the refreshed CSP priorities in light of the strategic assessment findings.
Supporting documents: