Issue - meetings

This report seeks approval to some changes to the Members’ Code of Conduct following a report from the Committee on Standards in Public Life (CSPL) on ethical standards in local government, which was published in January 2019.

This report sets out the response from the Councillor Conduct Committee to the best practice recommendations for Local Authorities made by the CSPL and also proposes a minor amendment to the Code as a consequence of the Civil Partnership (Opposite-sex Couples) Regulations 2019. 

Discussion:

This report provided details of some proposed changes to the Members’ Code of Conduct following a report from the Committee on Standards in Public Life (CSPL) on ethical standards in local government, which was published in January 2019. The report also proposed a minor amendment to the Code as a consequence of the Civil Partnership (Opposite-sex Couples) Regulations 2019.

The Councillor Conduct Committee considered this report on 6 November 2019, details of which were set out in the table below paragraph 2.10 of the report.

The Portfolio Holder for Business Management, Councillor Turpin, supported by Councillor Mrs Diane Chambers, proposed the recommendations set out in the report.

Decision:

a)    The Council approved the proposed changes to the Members’ Code of Conduct regarding bullying and harassment as recommended by the Councillor Conduct Committee and demonstrated as tracked changes in Section 2 (General Conduct) of Appendix 2 to the report.

b)    The Council approved the additional changes to the Members’ Code of Conduct in relation to how the categories of people who could give rise to a Member having a DPI are described in order to comply with the Civil Partnership (Opposite-sex Couples) Regulations 2019, as described in paragraphs 3.1-3.3 of the report and shown as tracked changes at Appendix 2 to the report.

c)    The Council noted the other decisions taken by the Councillor Conduct Committee in response to the best practice recommendations from the Committee on Standards in Public Life, as set out in the table below paragraph 2.10 of the report.

This report provides an update on the Council’s response to the best practice recommendations made by the Committee on Standards in Public Life following its review of ethical standards in local government, which was published in January 2019. 

Discussion:

Members considered a report which provided an update on the Council’s response to the best practice recommendations made by the Committee on Standards in Public Life following its review of ethical standards in local government, which had been published in January 2019.

Regarding the best practice recommendation that councils should report on separate bodies they have set up or which they own as part of their annual

Governance statement, the Monitoring Officer clarified the purpose of this recommendation was to ensure these bodies abided by the Nolan principles of openness and there was no need to amend the Code of Conduct. The next Annual Governance Statement would refer to these bodies and request each of them to publish board agendas, minutes and annual reports.

A Member referred to the recommendation that an Independent Person should be consulted as to whether to undertake a formal investigation on an

allegation, and should be given the option to review and comment on allegations which the Monitoring Officer was minded to dismiss as being without merit, vexatious, or trivial. The extent to which the Independent Person was currently consulted was queried. A Member made the point that it could sometimes be difficult for Members to be completely objective when they knew the person who was the subject of the complaint and welcomed this additional input from the Independent Person. The Monitoring Officer advised that the Independent Person, under the current procedures, was consulted once the Committee had decided to investigate a complaint. This recommendation, whilst adding an element of delay into the process, would strengthen the process by ensuring Members and the Monitoring Officer had the benefit of an independent, objective view before a decision was made to either carry out a formal investigation or dismiss a complaint as being without merit, vexatious or trivial.

A Member commented that it was encouraging to see that much of the best practice recommendations were already embedded in the Council’s procedures and practices.

Members’ attention was drawn to revised recommendations which had been tabled and which fully reflected the suggested way forward as set out in the report.

Decision:

The Committee agreed to:

a)     recommend the proposed changes to the Code, as demonstrated as tracked changes at Appendix 2 to the report, to Full Council;

b)     approve the changes to the procedure for dealing with Member Conduct Complaints, as demonstrated as tracked changes at Appendix 3 to the report;

c)     agree to review the Member Code of Conduct every four years and make recommendations to full Council as necessary, and that where possible when substantial changes are proposed, the views of the public, community organisations and neighbouring authorities are sought;

d)     instruct officers to add a link to the Member Code of Conduct webpage from the page relating to Council complaints generally;

e)     agree that the current approach of publishing information on the website, as part of the Minutes of the Councillor Conduct Committee, continue instead of publishing a decision notice relating to the outcome of  ...  view the full minutes text for item 415