Decision details

Gateway 3 Contract Award: Household Waste Recycling Centres (pre-decision scrutiny)

Decision Maker: Regeneration, Community and Culture Overview and Scrutiny Committee, Cabinet

Decision status: Recommendations approved

Is Key decision?: Yes

Is subject to call in?: No

Purpose:

This report will recommend the approval of the tender for the Household Waste Recycling Centres contract.  

Decisions:

Discussion:

 

The Acting Head of Waste Services introduced the report advising that the contract would cover the management of the three sites within Medway and for finding the markets for most of the materials disposed of there. The tender had set out that a 50% recycling rate should be achieved in the first year of the contract and 60% for each subsequent year.

 

Four bidders had been found to be compliant and an overview of their proposals were set out in paragraph 8.4 of the report. After a full technical, professional ability and financial scoring system had been undertaken the bid from Bidder 4 was found to be the most economically advantageous tender.

 

The reason for urgency accepted by the Chairman was that the report had to be submitted to this meeting in order that the committee’s views could be forwarded to Cabinet on 20 July 2010.

 

Members asked various questions and commented on:

 

·        the layout of entry into the site at Cuxton to avoid any lengthy traffic delays;

·        the types of chemical waste that could be disposed of at the household waste sites. Officers advised that a strict list of chemicals were allowed on site but this would be reviewed with the contractor to allow as many products as possible to be disposed of safely at the sites;

·        staff incentive schemes – assurance that this would not turn into shortcuts and compromise safety at the sites. Officers advised that the incentive scheme was to encourage staff to separate out rubbish into the correct bins and that staff also took ownership to ensure that residents did the same to achieve the best recycling rates. It was noted that that the scheme did not apply to any council staff;

·        private house clearance – entry of vans into the household sites. Officers advised that current arrangements would continue, allowing un-signed or hired vans into the Capstone site on certain dates by pre-appointment;

·        what happened to wood waste? The committee was advised that this was a separate contract in partnership with Kent County Council where a minimum of 70% of the wood collected would be recycled.

 

Decision:

 

The committee agreed to recommend that Cabinet agrees:

(a)               the award of the contract for the management of the household waste recycling centres to Bidder 4 as the most economically advantageous tender (MEAT);

(b)               to authorise the Chief Finance Officer (who is the officer responsible for the proper administration of the Council’s financial affairs under section 151 of the Local Government Act 1972) as the officer responsible for signing certificates issued under the Local Government (Contracts) Act 1997 in respect of the management of the household waste recycling centre contracts to be entered into by the Council.

Report author: Sarah Valdus

Publication date: 13/07/2010

Date of decision: 06/07/2010

Decided at meeting: 06/07/2010 - Regeneration, Community and Culture Overview and Scrutiny Committee

Accompanying Documents: